Judicial Delays in India: Analysing the Causes and Exploring Solutions for Expedited Justice

Main Article Content

Dr. Jai Prakash Kushwah
Suraj Pratap Singh Kushwah

Abstract

Judicial delays in India are a significant concern, severely impeding the timely delivery of justice and eroding public confidence in the judicial system. This paper examines the key causes of judicial delays, including the overwhelming backlog of cases, a shortage of judges, outdated infrastructure, and procedural inefficiencies. With millions of cases pending in courts across the country, the pressure on the judicial system is immense, resulting in delayed hearings and extended litigation periods. The shortage of judges, particularly in lower courts, exacerbates this issue, with courts struggling to handle the heavy caseload. Additionally, the lack of technological integration and outdated legal processes further contribute to delays, with frequent adjournments and inefficient case management.


The paper explores potential solutions to expedite the judicial process. First, increasing the number of judges, especially in lower courts, would help reduce the backlog and speed up hearings. The establishment of specialized fast-track courts and tribunals for specific case categories, such as commercial and corruption cases, would provide quicker resolutions. Investment in judicial infrastructure, including digitalization and modern case management systems, is crucial for enhancing efficiency. The adoption of technology, such as e-courts and artificial intelligence tools, could help streamline administrative tasks and case tracking. Additionally, legal reforms aimed at simplifying procedures and promoting alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation and arbitration would further reduce delays.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr. Jai Prakash Kushwah, & Suraj Pratap Singh Kushwah. (2024). Judicial Delays in India: Analysing the Causes and Exploring Solutions for Expedited Justice. Research Inspiration, 9(III), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v9n3.02
Section
Articles

References

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973 AIR 1461).

All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India (2002 4 SCC 247).

M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law (7th ed., LexisNexis, 2021).

Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979 AIR 1369).

Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005 6 SCC 344).

Law Commission of India, 245th Report (2014).

All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India (2002 4 SCC 247).

Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005 6 SCC 344).

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Anil Kumar Sharma (2015 6 SCC 716).

Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha (2012 11 SCC 565).

Imtiyaz Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2012 2 SCC 688).

Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmala Devi (2011 8 SCC 249).

Krishna Swami v. Union of India (1992 AIR 1789).

Law Commission of India, 245th Report (2014).

A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak (1992 AIR 1701).

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978 AIR 597).

Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari (2008 9 SCC 648).

State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977 AIR 2447).

Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana (2010 12 SCC 350).

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987 SCR (1) 819).

Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India (2018 10 SCC 639).

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (2010 8 SCC 24).

Union of India v. Pirthwi Singh (2018 16 SCC 363).

State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Punjaji Shah (1981 AIR 1675).

Union of India v. Pirthwi Singh (2018 16 SCC 363).