The jurisprudential role of the BNS, BNSS, and BSA in Co-establishing a speedy and impartial trial

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v11n3.02

Keywords:

BNS, BNSS, BSA, Jurisprudence, speedy trial, impartial trial, criminal justice reform, procedural fairness, due process, evidentiary law, judicial efficiency, fair-trial rights, Indian criminal justice system

Abstract

For than 160 years the criminal justice system in the Indian subcontinent was limited by three colonial laws created by the British Crown. These laws were the Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860 the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of 1898 (which was updated in 1973) and the Indian Evidence Act of 1872. These laws were written during a time when the British ruled the land. They were made by people like Thomas Babington Macaulay. These laws were designed to keep control stop people from being free and make sure the government had power than individuals. As years went on and the 21st century arrived this system became impossible to use because of many cases waiting to be handled. The old rules did not have ways to deal with kinds of crimes. These crimes include things like money frauds on the web, cyber-terrorism that crosses borders stealing identities, groups that do bad things together and hiding money through digital currencies.

The system got stuck because of rules, unclear words and long delays. This made the legal process itself feel like a punishment, without a trial. Millions of people who had not been found guilty ended up in prisons for years without a decision. The system needed a change. It needed to become something that listens to victims uses technology and protects the rights of people.

References

Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R. S. Nayak, (1992) 1 SCC 225 (India).

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023, India Code (2023). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/20099

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code (2023). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/20062

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, No. 47 of 2023, India Code (2023). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/20063

Bhardwaj, A. (2025). Right to speedy and fair trial: A fundamental pillar of justice. IJLRSS, 6(2), 114–128.

BNSS, 2023 and reforms in criminal justice administration. (2024). Civil Law Journal, 5(1), 31–42.

Constitution of India. (1950).

Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs. (2023a). Two hundred forty-sixth report on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Rajya Sabha Secretariat. https://sansad.in/getFile/rsnew/Committee_site/Committee_File/ReportFile/15/188/246_2023_11_16.pdf?source=rajyasabha

Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs. (2023b). Two hundred forty-seventh report on the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Rajya Sabha Secretariat. https://sansad.in/getFile/rsnew/Committee_site/Committee_File/ReportFile/15/188/247_2023_11_16.pdf?source=rajyasabha

Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs. (2023c). Two hundred forty-eighth report on the Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023. Rajya Sabha Secretariat. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2023/SC_Report_Bharatiya_Sakshya_Bill_2023.pdf

Economic Laws Practice. (2024, July 11). BNS: Speedy justice or colonial rollover.

Ganguly, A. (2025). Statutory time-bound trials under the BNSS: A paradigm shift or procedural illusion? JCLJ, 12(3), 45–62.

Ghosh, P. (2024). BNSS, 2023 (2nd ed.). Eastern Book Company.

Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81 (India). https://api.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/4873.pdf

Kansal, R. (2024). BNSS: Part 1. Aggarwal Law House.

Law Commission of India. (2012). Expeditious investigation and trial of criminal cases against influential public personalities (Report No. 239). Government of India. https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/cat_supreme_court_and_high_court/

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248 (India).

Ministry of Home Affairs. (2025). Annual report 2024–2025. Government of India.

P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 4 SCC 578 (India).

Pradeep, S. (2025). Transition from the CrPC to the BNSS: A fundamental shift in procedural jurisprudence. SCCJ, 18(1), 89–104.

PRS Legislative Research. (2023). Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Legislative brief.

Rao, C. M. (2023). Comprehensive investigation compendium on new criminal laws: BNS, BNSS, and BSA 2023 (3rd ed.). Asia Law House.

Sharma, A. K., & Kandharkar, R. (2025). Entire stages of criminal trial as per new criminal laws: BNS, BNSS, and BSA—2023. White Mann.

Transformative impact of BNS, BNSS and BSA. (2026). International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 7(4), 1120–1135.

United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 4 SCC 158 (India). https://api.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/27561.pdf

Published

30-06-2026
CITATION
DOI: 10.53724/inspiration/v11n3.02
Published: 30-06-2026

How to Cite

Chanchal Khatri. (2026). The jurisprudential role of the BNS, BNSS, and BSA in Co-establishing a speedy and impartial trial. Research Inspiration, 11(III), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v11n3.02

Issue

Section

Articles

ARK