Section 69 of BNS 2023: Balancing Justice and Safeguards Against False Allegations in Cases of Sexual Intercourse by Deception
Main Article Content
Abstract
The enactment of Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, marks a significant shift in Indian criminal law by criminalizing sexual intercourse obtained through deceitful means. While the provision aims to protect individuals from fraudulent consent violations, it also raises concerns regarding the potential for misuse and false allegations. This research critically examines the scope, interpretation, and judicial challenges associated with Section 69, focusing on the delicate balance between safeguarding victims' rights and preventing wrongful prosecution.
One of the primary concerns is the subjective nature of deception, particularly in cases involving false promises of marriage, misrepresentation of identity, or coercion through fraudulent means. Judicial precedents under Section 375 of the IPC (now replaced) have already seen debates over distinguishing genuine breaches of trust from criminal offenses. This study evaluates how Section 69 differs from previous laws, how courts might interpret deceit in sexual relationships, and what safeguards exist to prevent frivolous complaints.
A comparative analysis with global legal frameworks, including laws from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, provides insight into how other jurisdictions handle similar cases and whether India's legal system needs additional safeguards. Furthermore, the paper explores potential evidentiary challenges, the burden of proof, and the risk of reputational damage caused by false accusations.
To ensure judicial fairness, this research suggests policy recommendations, including stricter evidentiary requirements, preliminary screening mechanisms, and clearer judicial guidelines for handling cases under Section 69. Ultimately, this paper aims to contribute to the ongoing legal discourse by advocating for a balanced approach one that upholds victim protection while preventing the weaponization of the law for malicious intent.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
The importance of balancing victim redress with procedural safeguards has been a subject of recent legislative debates
For a discussion on modern interpretations of consent, see Johnson, A. (2023). Consent in the Modern Era.
See Martinez, L. (2022). Deception and Consent: Legal Challenges.
Refer to Smith, R. (2023). Evidentiary Standards in Sexual Consent Cases.
Comparative analyses in international law journals highlight similar reforms across jurisdictions.
Comprehensive reviews in legal periodicals have emphasized the dual commitment inherent in Section.
Uday v. State of Karnataka, (2003) 4 SCC 46.
Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 675.
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 9 SCC 608.
Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2019) 13 SCC 1.
K.D. Gaur, Textbook on Indian Penal Code (6th ed., 2022).
Justice J.S. Verma Committee Report on Criminal Law Amendments (2013).
G.B. Reddy, Principles of Criminal Law (10th ed., 2021).
Mahesh Balkrishna Dange v. State of Maharashtra, (2007) CrLJ 2957 (Bom).
UK Sexual Offenses Act, 2003, Section 76.
People v. Evans, 85 Misc.2d 1088 (NY Sup. Ct. 1976).
B.B. Pande, Comparative Criminal Law (2019).
Anuja Agrawal, "False Accusations in Rape Cases in India: A Critical Study," Indian Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 8, 2021.
National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) Report, 2022
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra [(2019) 9 SCC 608]
Supra, 14
Supra, 9
Supra, 8
Mahesh Balkrishna Dange v. State of Maharashtra [(2007) CrLJ 2957 (Bom)].