Published 30-06-2018
Keywords
- Triple Pronouncement,
- Halala,
- Constitutionality of Triple Talaq by Judicial pronouncement
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The issue of the Triple divorce is regarded as highly sensitive among the Muslims in India. The Holy Quran is very cautious in matter of divorce, may be triple divorce has a effect of irrevocable but have to be spaced over a period of three months to give husband and wife time for reconciliation their relationship through the intervention of family members and friends. Triple Talaq pronounced by Husband only when the wife is in state of Tuhur. Yet despite clear Quranic injunctions to the contrary, immediate triple divorce is permitted, destroying matrimonial life in a one breathe. Triple Talaq is an inhuman practice that violates rights and dignity of women. The Constitution of India under Article 25 confers Right to Freedom of religion. The protection under Articles 25 and 26 extend guarantee to rituals, observances, ceremonies, mode of worship etc. which are integral to religion. But for such practices to be considered as a part of the religion.
References
- Surat An Nisa [4:35]- Al Qur‟an al-Kareem
- In re Abdul Ali (1883) 7 Bom.180; Amir-ud-Din v KhatunBibi (1971) 39 all. 371: 39 I.C. 513
- Sarabhai v Rabiabai (1905) 30 Bom. 537: SC 8 Bom. LR.35; Sheikh Fazlur v musamnat Aisha (1929) 8 Pat. 690: 115 I.c. 546: AIR 1929 Pat 81
- LNIND 2017 SC 415
- (1910) 3, Madras 22
- (1911) 36 Calcutta 184
- Meaning: the percepts, actions and sayings of the Prophet Mohammad, not written down during his lifetime, but preserved by tradition and handed down by generations
- Meaning: the occurrence of opinion of the companions of Mohammad and his disciples
- Being analogical deductions derived from comparisons of the first three sources
- Abu Dawud 9:2173
- Surah al-Baqarah 2:228
- Surah al-Baqarah 2:230
- (2002) 7 SCC 513
- 2010 (2) KHC 63
- AIR 1952 Bom. 84
- Paragraph 13 of Narasu Appa Mali: AIR 1952 Bom 84
- (1985) 2 SCC 556
- (2001) 7 SCC 740
- (2003) 6 SCC 611
- Constitution of India
- Constitution of India
- Constitution of India
- (2016) 2 SCC 36
- ShamimAra v State of Uttar Pradesh, (2002) 7 SCC 518
- Ibid
- The Wire, Abandoned Women Vastly Outnumber Victims of Triple Talaq and It‟s Time Modi Spoke Up for Them, December 12, 2016, available at https://thewire.in/86335/abandoned-women-triple-talaq/
- AIR 2002 SC 3551
- 2003 (1) Bom Cr 740
- Sri Jiauddin v Anwara Begum, (1981) 1 GLR 358; Rukia Khatun v Abdul Khalique Laskar, (1981) 1 GLR 375
- Parveen Akhtar v Union Of India, 2003-1-LW (CrL) 115
- AIR 1932 PC 25
- Paragrapgh 15 of Rashid Ahmed v AnisaKhatun AIR 1932 PC 25
- Paragrapgh 16 of Rashid Ahmed v AnisaKhatun AIR 1932 PC 25
- Paragrapgh 17 of Rashid Ahmed v AnisaKhatun AIR 1932 PC 25
- Paragrapgh 18 of Rashid Ahmed v AnisaKhatun AIR 1932 PC 25
- Paragrapgh 19 of Rashid Ahmed v AnisaKhatun AIR 1932 PC 25
- (1981) 1 Gau LR 358
- (1981) 1 Gau LR 375
- 2008 (103) DRJ 137
- LNIND 2017 SC 415