Live in Relationships, Legal Recognition and Its Challenges in India: A Critical Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research critically explores the socio-legal evolution, judicial recognition, and emerging challenges surrounding live-in relationships in India. While such relationships have gained visibility due to changing societal norms and increased individual autonomy, their legal recognition remains limited, ambiguous, and often inconsistent. This study examines judicial pronouncements, legislative lacunae, societal attitudes, and comparative international models to offer a holistic analysis of the current legal framework. It also investigates the implications of such relationships on rights related to maintenance, inheritance, domestic violence, and legitimacy of children. The research concludes with suggestions to formulate a more inclusive and consistent policy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Agnes, F. (2019). Law and gender inequality: The politics of women's rights in India. Oxford University Press.
American Bar Association. (2019). State laws on common-law marriage. https://www.americanbar.org
American Bar Association. (2021). State laws on common-law marriage. https://www.americanbar.org.
Ally Abubakar, Tariq, Kumar, Ramesh (2024). Implementation of Women’s Human Rights in Dar Es Salaam with Special Reference to Domestic Violence: A Critical Appraisal. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental. 18 (5), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-038.
Baxi, U. (2008). The future of human rights. Oxford University Press.
Borrillo, D. (2010). The PACS in France: Recognition without equality. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebp011
Choudhury, S. (2020). Legal pluralism and cohabitation rights. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(2), 98–115.
Cossman, B. (2014). The new politics of cohabitation: Living together, law, and the meanings of partnership. University of Toronto Press.
D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal, (2010) 10 SCC 469.
European Commission. (2020). Legal recognition of same-sex and cohabiting couples.
Fehlberg, B., Millbank, J., & Behrens, J. (2021). Australian family law: The contemporary context (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
House of Commons Library. (2021). Cohabitation: Legal rights of cohabitants. UK Parliament. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk
Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma, (2013) 15 SCC 755.
Jain, R. (2021). Legal status of live-in relationships in India: Role of judiciary and unresolved challenges. Indian Journal of Law and Society, 12(1), 87–105.
Jaising, I. (2020). Domestic violence and the rights of women in live-in relationships. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 34–52.
Jaising, I. (2020). Domestic violence and women in live-in relationships: Legal rights and policy implications. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521520905146
Kumar, Ramesh. Verma Kumar, Rohit. (2022). Meninism and Preconceived Ideology with specific Indian Dimension of Human Rights in Today’s Changing Globalized Scenario: A Critical Appraisal. Legal Research Development. 7 (1) 27-29.
Khushboo v. Kanniammal, (2010) 5 SCC 600.
Kumar, V. (2018). Changing dimensions of Indian family law. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 9(1), 88–106.
Kumar, Ramesh, (2022). State Human Rights Commissions as Enforcement System in India: A Critical Appraisal. Research Inspiration. 7 (2), 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v7n2.02.
Law Commission of India. (2018). Report No. 277 on recognition of live-in relationships. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.
Ministry of Women and Child Development (India). (2022). Policy brief on live-in relationships.
Mishra, R. (2023). Children born out of live-in relationships: A legal dilemma in Indian jurisprudence. Law and Society Journal, 40(4), 210–227.
Mishra, R. (2023). The Domestic Violence Act and non-marital relationships. Law and Society Journal, 40(4), 203–219.
National Commission for Women. (2015). Report on legal rights of women in non-marital relationships.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1.
Pandey, A. (2023). Domestic partnerships and legal voids in India. SCC Online Journal, 29(2), 59–78.
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 2005 (India).
Kumar, Ramesh, et al., (2024). Men’s Human Rights as a Need of Hour in the Gravity of Today’s Scenarized World of Globalization with Specific Medical and Biological Dimensions: A Critical Appraisal. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 22 (2), 16560-16586. doi: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001203.
Rao, M. (2020). Constitutional morality and non-traditional relationships. NUJS Law Review, 13(3), 145–164.
Rao, S. (2021). Social norms versus constitutional morality in live-in relationship cases. NUJS Law Review, 14(2), 114–129.
S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal, (2010) 5 SCC 600.
Sharma, R. (2022). Comparative approaches to cohabitation: Lessons for Indian legal reform. Journal of Comparative Law, 16(1), 85–102.
Sharma, R. (2022). Comparative legal approaches to cohabitation. Journal of Comparative Law, 16(1), 77–93.
Singh, A. (2021). Legal status of live-in relationships in India: A critical analysis of judicial trends. Indian Bar Review, 48(2), 112–132.
Singh, A. (2021). Legal uncertainty in live-in relationships: A critique of Indian judicial approach. Indian Bar Review, 48(2), 112–132.
UK House of Commons. (2021). Cohabitation Rights Bill – HL Bill 13.
United Nations. (2020). Family diversity and the law: An international perspective on legal recognition of relationships. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
United Nations. (2021). Report on family diversity and legal recognition.