Practical Approach towards Law Relating to Sexual Offences in perspective view of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
Published 30-12-2021
Keywords
- Sexual offences,
- Presumption of consent,
- Presumption of innocent,
- Potency test,
- Live in-relationship & co-habitation
- Fair investigation,
- Fair trial,
- Previous sexual character,
- Previous sexual experience ...More
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Law relating to sexual offences inserted and amended by the attribute of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 (in short the Act, 2013). Sec 166A neglecting the law by the person who is the State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, sec 166B castigation for denial to treat to the victim, Sec. 375 definitions of rape have, Sec. 354A, 354 B sexual harassment, sec. 354C voyeurism, sec. 354D stalking has been inserted in IPC. Sec 154, sec 161, sec. 164 have been amended in Cr.P.C. and sec. 53A irrelevancy of the previous sexual character and previous sexual experience of the victim, Sec 114A presumption of consent, sec. 146 bans to raise questions relating to previous sexual experience during cross-examination have been substituted and amended in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The study has explored the perspective view of- the need for a potency test, the impact on live in-relationship and cohabitation, fair investigation, fair trial, and the impact of presumption of consent and presumption of innocence. These aspects have been observed and experienced by the researcher during the course of advocacy; therefore practical approach toward law relating to sexual offences as amended, inserted, and substituted by the Act.
The concluding statements of the research paper include suggestions on various aspects as mentioned hereinabove have been categorically elaborated on the basis of doctrines of Criminal Jurisprudence and views of various jurisdictions of High Courts and Apex Court.
References
- SC No. 63/13.
- (1992) 3 SCC 204.
- (2010) 2 SCC 9.
- (2009) 15 SCC 543.
- (2007) 14 SCC 454.
- (2007) 11 SCC 265.
- (1998) 6 SCC 29.
- legal Eagle SC 14.
- (12) SCC 254.
- (9) SCC 567.
- (5) SCC 518.
- AIOC 142.
- (12) SCC 254.
- (6)SCC 1.
- (5) SCC 762.
- (7) SCC 407.
- AIR SC 1207.
- AIR 1950 SC 27.
- (16) SCC 466.
- W.P. (Civil) No. 565 of 2012, decided on December 5th, 2018
- Decided on 26/04/17 in Cri. A No. 9/2012.
- AIR 2013 SC 2408.
- Decided on 22/02/2018 in Cri. A. 1168/2001.
- Decided on 29/08/2017 in Cri. A 629/2003.
- (1890) ILR Cal 49.
- (1979) 2 SCC 143.
- Cr.A. 590/2005, Judgment dated 12/07/2018.
- PP Countroy v/s Emperor, 1944 Nag 245
- MLJ Cr. 61
- (1) SCC 212
- (10) AIC 427
- Cr.L.J. 1352 (Ori)
- Cr.L.J. 1752
- (1) Cr.L.C. 436
- (3) A.I.Cr.L.R. 872 Cal
- Dr. O.P. Aggrawal 2006; evidence of Doctor in rape cases not mandatory: Supreme Court, JIAFM, 2006; 28 (4) ISSN: 0971-0973
- (4) SCC 46
- Crl.A. 314/2015 decided on Dec 8, 2015
- CWP NO. 843/2017 decided on November 20, 2017.
- Md Shadab Rasheel, Abhishek Yadav, (2016). Potency test of a rape accused in India- Rationale, problems and suggestions in light of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013, Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2016 (6), 333-336
- Raghuvir Desai v/s State, 2007 Cr.L.J. 829 (Bom.)
- Cr.L.J. 964 (Del.)
- (7) SCC 130
- (5) SCC 509
- (5) SCC 108
- (4) SCC 69
- Joanna Jolly: Does India have a problem with false rape claims?: Published on 08 Feb. 2017, & Last seen on 28th Nov. 2021, https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-38796457
- Delhi: Police move to cancel FIR after woman says rape allegation untrue; written by Mahendra Singh Manral, New Delhi; published: August 12, 2018
- D. D. Basu 92009) Shorter Constitution of India. V 14th ed. P 94
- Cri.L.J. 3382
- Legal Eagle 473
- AIR 1958 Ori 224
- Cr.A. no. 504/2018
- M.Cr.C. 12688/2017, Hon’ble M.P. High Court
- Crl.A. 859/2013 , decided on Dec 1st, 2015
- CR M-M No.10450/2016, decided on May 8, 2017,
- LXXXI, Punjab L.R. 194
- UP. Cr.R. 26
- Cr.L.J. 1420
- (2) SCC 550
- Cr.L.J. NOC 43 (Kar),
- Cr.L.R. (Raj) 446
- Cr.L.J. 569 (Jha.)
- Cri.L.J (NOC) 436 (UTR).
- Crl. A. 13/2016, decided on January 6th , 2016
- Crl.A. 913/2003, decided on May 5th, 2009
- Cr.L.J. 1355 (M.P.)
- Criminal appeal no. 1395/15,
- Cr. A. 1304/15
- Cri.L.J (NOC) 416 (Cal)
- Cri.L.J. 3382
- SLP (Cr.) No. 6532 of 2018
- Cr.A. No. 4053/2013, decided on Jun 21, 2017
- Cr.A No. 222/1997, decided on April 8th, 2005
- Crl. A. No. 369/2014, decided on May 29, 2015
- AIR SC 1207